On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:48:54PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > This patch is still wrong.
> > It seems my comment on this [1] was lost:
> > <-- snip -->
> > This line has to be something like
> > ( (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 3 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 4)
> > && \
> > HEAVILY_PATCHED_SUSE_GCC )
>
> > I hope SuSE has added some #define to distinguish what they call "gcc
> > 3.3.4" from GNU gcc 3.3.4
>
> It wasn't lost - I am just disinclined to cater to distros making their
> gcc lie about its version.
And therefore you added a patch that helps only those distros at the
price of breaking other people and distros using sane compilers?
> Jeff
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
