On Tuesday 19 April 2005 18:36, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
> Hi Blaisorblade,
>
> On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 23:11 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 April 2005 20:36, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
> > > Hello,
>
> [...]
>
> > discussed patch which fixed it. I'd like to know any info on this road
> > (it's possible that these two bugs are just similar, but entirely
> > different, but I'd like some reports).
> >
> > Also I'm currently in short of time, so I cannot investigate this well...
>
> sorry, I don't seem to unterstand. I searched the devel list archive
> (I'm not subscribed to devel) and found the thread on the change
> from /proc/stat. I can confirm that my problem seems to be related. But
> I wasn't able to extract the info which patch should solve the problem.
The patch I suggested to Chris was named, in the patch,
"update-process-times", however the name in my tree was uml-timer-context.
I've attached it.
Chris Aker reported that in 2.6.10 it fixed the problem, but I didn't verify
(even because I simply knew that patch *had* to be applied to fix some
problems, so I just asked it to check that it fixed also that problem). Also,
this patch *has* been applied in 2.6.11; however, I'd still like a
confirmation that it fixed the problem in 2.6.10.
That said, I'm currently running and verifying this on 2.6.11 and what I see
with top is that
a) ksoftirqd is always runnable, but
b) it always gets 0% cpu usage
which is *very* strange.
While on 2.6.9 it works perfectly ok.
> I tried all of your -bb and -bs from 2.6.10 to 2.6.11.7 with the same
> result on load 1.0. Beside of that the kernels seem to be very stable.
> I'm running 5 Guest UMLs with Mailserver (exim,spamassasin,clamav deb-
> sarge), WWW (lamp, deb-sarge), Aptcache (squid, deb-sarge), 2 UMLs for
> friends (LAMP, Mail, deb-sarge) on an 2.6.8skas-v6 Host (deb-sarge). I
> now went back to a 2.4.27-bs1 which seems to be rock-solid because some
> of the friends didn't like the 1.0 load in their stats or something :)
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
From: Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In call to update_process_times() set parameter user
correctly. (was from for SKAS).
Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
vanilla-linux-2.6.9-paolo/arch/um/kernel/time_kern.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/um/kernel/time_kern.c~uml-timer-context arch/um/kernel/time_kern.c
--- vanilla-linux-2.6.9/arch/um/kernel/time_kern.c~uml-timer-context 2004-12-01 18:04:36.967383992 +0100
+++ vanilla-linux-2.6.9-paolo/arch/um/kernel/time_kern.c 2004-12-01 18:04:36.971383384 +0100
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void timer_handler(int sig, union uml_pt
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
local_irq_disable();
- update_process_times(user_context(UPT_SP(regs)));
+ update_process_times(CHOOSE_MODE(user_context(UPT_SP(regs)), (regs)->skas.is_user));
local_irq_enable();
#endif
if(current_thread->cpu == 0)
_
