Messages by Date
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Linus Torvalds
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/22
[uml-devel] [RFC] UML/x86_64 module loader
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Linus Torvalds
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Borislav Petkov
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/22
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Ingo Molnar
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Linus Torvalds
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
H. Peter Anvin
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Linus Torvalds
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/21
Re: [uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/21
[uml-devel] SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386)
Al Viro
-
2011/08/20
Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/20
Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/20
Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/20
Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386
Andrew Lutomirski
-
2011/08/20
Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/20
Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/20
Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/19
[uml-devel] [RFC] weird crap with vdso on uml/i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/19
Re: [uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/18
Re: [uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
Re: [uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 78/91] um: switch to use of drivers/Kconfig
Arnaud Lacombe
-
2011/08/18
Re: [uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 91/91] um: distribute exports to where exported stuff is defined
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 90/91] um: kill system-um.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 89/91] um: generic ftrace.h will do...
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 87/91] um: asm/pda.h is not needed anymore
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 88/91] um: segment.h is x86-only and needed only there
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 86/91] um: hw_irq.h can go generic as well
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 85/91] um: switch to generic-y
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 84/91] um: clean Kconfig up a bit
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 83/91] um: a couple of missing dependencies...
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 82/91] um: kill useless argument of free_chan() and free_one_chan()
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
Re: [uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 81/91] um: clean arch_ptrace() up a bit
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 78/91] um: switch to use of drivers/Kconfig
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 80/91] um: unify ptrace_user.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 79/91] um: unify KSTK_...
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 77/91] um: fix gcov build breakage
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 76/91] um: page_offset.h is never used
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 74/91] um: required-features.h is there only to shadow x86 one...
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 75/91] um: irq_vectors.h just shadows x86 one
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 73/91] um: asm/apic.h is there only to shadow the x86 one...
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 71/91] um: take ldt.h to arch/x86/um/asm/mm_context.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 72/91] um: take ubd_user.h to its users...
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 70/91] um: merge signal_{32,64}.c
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 69/91] um: no need to play with save_sp in signal frame setup anymore
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 68/91] um: increase stack growth cushion in pagefault
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 67/91] um: merge HOST_... of registers common on i386 and amd64
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 66/91] um: sanitize paths in sys_call_table* includes
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 65/91] um: merge os-Linux/tls.c into arch/x86/um/os-Linux/tls.c
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 64/91] um: move asm/desc.h into arch/x86/um/asm
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 63/91] um: merge host_ldt_{32,64}.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 62/91] um: merge tls_{32,64}.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 61/91] um: take um_mmu.h to asm/mmu.h, clean asm/mmu_context.h a bit
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 60/91] um: kill useless include of user.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 59/91] um: kill um_uaccess.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 57/91] um: take chan_*.h and line.h to arch/um/drivers
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 58/91] um: take mconsole*.h to arch/um/drivers
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 56/91] um: take register_winch_irq() into the caller of is_skas_winch()
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 55/91] um: kill shared/mem_kern.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 54/91] um: kill shared/tlb.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 53/91] um: make flush_tlb_kernel_range_common() static
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 52/91] um: kill shared/task.h and HOST_TASK_REGS
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 51/91] um: shared/syscall.h is not even included
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 50/91] ... and don't include kern.h unless it's needed
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 49/91] um: trim kern.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 48/91] um: make load_initrd() static, kill shared/initrd.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 46/91] um: take arch/um/sys-x86 to arch/x86/um
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 47/91] um: bury unused macros around ptrace.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 45/91] um: merge Makefile-{i386, x86_64}
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 44/91] um: trim detritus from Makefile-i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 42/91] um: merge kernel_offsets_*.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 43/91] um: arch_hweight.h is needed only on uml-x86
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 41/91] um: merge skas_ptrace.h 32/64bit variants
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 40/91] um: sysdep/barrier.h is not used for anything
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 38/91] um: finish conversion to mcontext_t
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 39/91] um: shared/process.h is empty now; kill it
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 37/91] um: start switching the references to host mcontext_t to its userland type
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 36/91] um: take userland definition of barrier() to user.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 35/91] um: take system.h out of shared/sysdep
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 34/91] um: fill the handlers array at build time
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 32/91] um: don't bother blocking SIGARLM and SIGUSR1
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 33/91] um: simplify set_handler()
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 31/91] um: switch stub_segv_handler to SA_SIGINFO variant, get rid of magic crap in there
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 30/91] um: kill includes of sysdep/sigcontext.h from stuff built with kernel headers
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 29/91] um: merge arch/um/os-Linux/sys-{i386, x86_64}
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 28/91] um: merge hard_handler() instances, switch to use of SA_SIGINFO
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 27/91] um: kill dead code around uaccess
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 26/91] um: merge arch/um/sys-{i386, x86_64}
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 25/91] um: merge arch/um/sys-{i386, x86_64}/shared
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 24/91] um: merge arch/um/sys-{i386, x86_64}/asm
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 23/91] um: get rid of unused macros in ptrace_user.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 22/91] um: get rid of sysdep/sc.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 21/91] um: Get rid of UPT_SET/UPT_REG macros
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 20/91] um: take vm-flags.h to sys-*/asm
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 19/91] um: get rid of sysdep/checksum.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 17/91] um: get rid of kern_constants.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 18/91] um: trim unused junk from user.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 15/91] um: -include user.h for USER_OBJ, trim includes
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 16/91] um: kill a couple of useless includes of kern_constants.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 14/91] um: take user_constants.h to include/generated
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 13/91] um: kill skas_ptregs.h
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 10/91] um: make copy_sc() static
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 12/91] um: switch to -idirafter, get saner kern_constants.h out of that
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 11/91] um: series of __get_user() is costly in sigframe handling
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 08/91] um: switch {rt_, }sigreturn() to set_current_blocked()
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 09/91] um: don't rely on sc.fpstate not having been reassigned prior to rt_sigreturn()
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 07/91] um: use subarch-obj instead of copying...
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 06/91] um: PTRACE_[GS]ETFPXREGS had been wired on the wrong subarch
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 03/91] um: fix oopsable race in line_close()
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 05/91] um: fix free_winch() mess
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 04/91] um: winch_interrupt() can happen inside of free_winch()
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 01/91] um: fix strrchr problems
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 02/91] um: fix build breakage in mm/slub.c
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
[uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches
Al Viro
-
2011/08/18
Re: [uml-devel] Floating point problems on UML - help needed
Ingo van Lil
-
2011/08/18
Re: [uml-devel] Floating point problems on UML - help needed
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/18
Re: [uml-devel] Floating point problems on UML - help needed
Stanislav Meduna
-
2011/08/17
[uml-devel] [linux-3.0] Regarding deprecation of __lookup_machine_type in arch/arm/kernel/head.S
jagan kernel
-
2011/08/17
[uml-devel] Floating point problems on UML - help needed
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/15
[uml-devel] [PATCH] UserModeLinux-HOWTO.txt: fix a typo
Jonathan Neuschäfer
-
2011/08/12
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UserModeLinux-HOWTO.txt: remove ^H characters
Jonathan Neuschäfer
-
2011/08/12
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UserModeLinux-HOWTO.txt: remove ^H characters
Jonathan Neuschäfer
-
2011/08/12
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UserModeLinux-HOWTO.txt: remove ^H characters
Randy Dunlap
-
2011/08/11
[uml-devel] [PATCH] um: drivers/xterm.c: fix a file descriptor leak
Jonathan Neuschäfer
-
2011/08/11
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/11
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
richard -rw- weinberger
-
2011/08/10
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/10
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/09
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/09
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/04
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Vasiliy Kulikov
-
2011/08/04
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Toralf Förster
-
2011/08/02
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCHv4 01/11] atomic: add *_dec_not_zero
Ralf Baechle
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Kyle Moffett
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Arnaud Lacombe
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Arnaud Lacombe
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Marc Zyngier
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Marc Zyngier
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Nicolas Pitre
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Arnaud Lacombe
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
richard -rw- weinberger
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Vasiliy Kulikov
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Vasiliy Kulikov
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Vasiliy Kulikov
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Kyle Moffett
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Uwe Kleine-König
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Vasiliy Kulikov
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Marc Zyngier
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Arnaud Lacombe
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Arnaud Lacombe
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Russell King - ARM Linux
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Geert Uytterhoeven
-
2011/08/01
[uml-devel] shm updates broke UML
Richard Weinberger
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Zoltan Devai
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
richard -rw- weinberger
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Russell King - ARM Linux
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Geert Uytterhoeven
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Geert Uytterhoeven
-
2011/08/01
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME
Russell King - ARM Linux
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
David Woodhouse
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
richard -rw- weinberger
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
David Woodhouse
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
David Woodhouse
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
Al Viro
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
David Woodhouse
-
2011/07/31
Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
richard -rw- weinberger
-
2011/07/30
[uml-devel] [PATCH 3/5] um: Always use -m32 when building for i386.
David Woodhouse
-
2011/07/30
[uml-devel] [PATCH 4/5] um: Do not define SUBARCH in CFLAGS
David Woodhouse
-
2011/07/30
[uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386
David Woodhouse
-
2011/07/30
[uml-devel] [PATCH 5/5] um: Fix SUBARCH=x86 build
David Woodhouse