[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > These are some trivial fixes for the x86-64 subarch module support. The only > potential problem is that I have to modify arch/x86_64/kernel/module.c, to > avoid copying the whole of it. > > I can't use it verbatim because it depends on a special vmalloc-like area for > modules, which for now (maybe that's to fix, I guess not) UML/x86-64 has not. > I went the easy way and reused the i386 vmalloc()-based allocator.
Why is this "for -mm" and not for -linus? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
