On Tuesday 08 November 2005 08:09, Rob Landley wrote: > On Monday 07 November 2005 23:13, Can Sar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to make a 1 thread version of UML that does not need to > > be able to support user level programs.
> Why? He may well be running Valgrind or something similar (Valgrind doesn't like us using clone(), even if it accepts fork()). Ah, btw, given his address, I wonder if he's related at all with some project like "Stanford Checker" or a relative of it. > Did you ever read Rik van Reil's list of the dumbest patches he's ever > seen? This is the first entry in the list: > > http://www.surriel.com/potm/apr2001.shtml Sorry I don't see your point, Rob - it's a really different thing. > Define "port". (Have you looked at mmu-less linux? Are you saying you > haven't got a timer interrupt and can't fake up some kind of green-threads > approach like people managed to do under _DOS_?) -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel