On Thursday 23 March 2006 22:14, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:17:45AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Do you have a set of patches which are candidates for akpm? I'm > looking at > > http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.15-bb6/ >broken-out/series > and that seems unsuitable, as some patches seem to reverse earlier > ones. Yes, that is true, but meanwhile give a testing to them, especially regression test the new patches. I can't merge new patches in until I'm sure they don't cause regressions. ASAP I'll test them bypassing the "x86_64 different host numbers" bug, and if they work and no issue seems introduced I'll do the merge. Meanwhile I could merge the initial stack without anything touching that extra load_TLS call in process_kern.c, but I hope to get to the real solution early enough. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger with Voice: chiama da PC a telefono a tariffe esclusive http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
