On Friday 24 March 2006 02:51, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:44:05AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Yes, that is true, but meanwhile give a testing to them, especially > > regressio test the new patches. I can't merge new patches in until I'm > > sure they don't cause regressions.
> OK, I give it a thumbs-up on a first boot - it's running my FC5 > filesystem without any trouble. I'll keep playing with it and let you > know of any trouble. With the x86-64 host hack, it works here too. To do good stress-testing, I've actually noticed the existing problems when I started running apache benchmark (with apache using multithreading, i.e. mpm_worker_thread). I run it like: ab2 -n 100 -c 10 -t 30 -v 1 Sarge/ where -n, -c and -t are simple parameters which can be tuned at will. (It could be simply ab on your distro). > Attached is a tarball of the patches merged after the patches I have > planned for 2.6.17. Nothing major, just some fuzz, some Makefile > rejections, and rejections from some whitespace cleanup in > kernel/skas/process_kern.c. Will look at. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger with Voice: chiama da PC a telefono a tariffe esclusive http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
