On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture > > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl. > > > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager? > > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.
Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside checkstack. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
