On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:45:48AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying,
> > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.
>
> Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we
> ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside
> checkstack.
There is no use of the symbol SUBARCH in arch/i386. While this may be
jarring to people who know and love Voyager, it doesn't break
anything.
We could do what you suggest, but that sounds unnecessary.
I'd rather either
leave things as they are
rename SUBARCH
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
