* Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > so there's no forced need to use -rt.
>
> Ah, forgotten about that.
>
> Unfortunately the latency tracer patch doesn't compile either:
>
> CC kernel/latency_trace.o
> kernel/latency_trace.c:28:21: error: asm/rtc.h: No such file or directory
> kernel/latency_trace.c:63:3: error: #error Implement cycles_to_usecs.
> kernel/latency_trace.c: In function ???____trace???:
> kernel/latency_trace.c:658: error: implicit declaration of function
> ???irqs_disabled_flags???
> make[1]: *** [kernel/latency_trace.o] Error 1
hm, just fill those functions in - should be fairly trivial and we can
carry those patches in -rt. (I'd suggest to create an empty asm-um/rtc.h
stub as well, for consistency.)
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
