* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > CC kernel/latency_trace.o
> > kernel/latency_trace.c:28:21: error: asm/rtc.h: No such file or directory
> > kernel/latency_trace.c:63:3: error: #error Implement cycles_to_usecs.
> > kernel/latency_trace.c: In function ???____trace???:
> > kernel/latency_trace.c:658: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ???irqs_disabled_flags???
> > make[1]: *** [kernel/latency_trace.o] Error 1
>
> hm, just fill those functions in - should be fairly trivial and we can
> carry those patches in -rt. (I'd suggest to create an empty
> asm-um/rtc.h stub as well, for consistency.)
trivial == 'far easier than porting -rt to UML' :-)
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
