Peter Teoh wrote: > Erh...I think I found the error. I did "make oldconfig arch=um", it > works. And now I did "make arch=um" it started compiling. Is this > correct? Documentation every says "make xxxconfig ARCH=um" where the > ARCH is capitals, which gave me error. Thanks. > ARCH has to be in uppercase. AFAIK, arch= has no effect. It now builds because you are building a normal (x86 or amd64) kernel and not a UML kernel. Which also means that you tree is now buggered, make mrproper may help... but might not be enough.
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:15:26AM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote: >> > > Looks right to me. >> > > >> > > I'm suspecting that Makefile is mangled somehow. Does git-diff show >> > > it as being changed? The md5sum I have here is >> > > >> > > md5sum arch/um/Makefile >> > > 9088cdab1c0b725568e8f269636dc6df arch/um/Makefile >> > > >> > > >> > >> > I think I saw from the webpage that 2.6.18 and higher up are not >> > supported, right? >> >> UML? Of course it's supported. And if you thought 2.6.25 wasn't, why >> are you trying to build it? >> >> >> >> Jeff >> >> -- >> Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
