On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:39:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Which begs the question why _is_ UML sucking in x86 stuff and can anyone
> provide us with some sensible reasons? Because if there aren't any, it
> is their includes that should be fixed. Let me see what I can do to
> redirect hweight stuff properly...
Generally, UML pulls in the host arch headers because they work. When
they are only architecture-dependent (and not, say, depending on the
host task struct or something), they're fine.
What's the include path from UML to the x86 hweight stuff?
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
