On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:46:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:09, Boaz Harrosh <bharr...@panasas.com> wrote: >> On 06/09/2010 11:04 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>> From: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> >>> >>> Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery >>> introduced with d61931d89be506372d01a90d1755f6d0a9fafe2d >>> (x86: Add optimized popcnt variants) and oopses during boot: >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127522065202435&w=2 >>> >>> Redirect arch_hweight.h include from the x86 portion to the generic >>> arch_hweight.h which is a fallback to the software hweight routines. >>> >>> LKML-Reference: <201005271944.09541.toralf.foers...@gmx.de> >>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > >Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> > >> who's going to push this ASAP. I was just (again) 3/4 through a bisect >> on 2.6.35-rc2. When I finally realized "Hey that patch, I forgot". >> (My concentration is not what it used to be) >> >> Please push this, someone > >Peter, are you happy with this? >Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a >regression in post-2.6.34. >
Usually Andrew should take UML patches. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
