On 06/14/2010 09:08 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 09:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/09/2010 01:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>
>>> Peter, are you happy with this?
>>> Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a
>>> regression in post-2.6.34.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I'll push it.
>>
>> -hpa
>
> Peter hi.
>
> Why have we missed that patch from -rc3. This is so *not fun* to keep
> out-of-tree patches. Specially when working with lots of other people's
> trees.
>
> Please push it ASAP
> Boaz
We made the decision of not pushing our queue for -rc3 because Linus
specifically wanted only critical fixes for -rc3. We will push it for
-rc4 for when Linus returns.
Also, you may want to consider moderating your tone.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
