On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 23:58 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > FWIW, the next step (still not pushed there) is to move arch/um/sys-x86 to > arch/x86/um, with arch/um/os-Linux/sys-x86 becoming arch/x86/um/os-Linux, > Kconfig.x86 moving to arch/x86/um/Kconfig and Makefile-x86 - to > arch/x86/um/Makefile.defs. Next after that - arch/powerpc/um (and yes, > it means resurrected uml/ppc port; for now - only ppc32, since I have no > ppc64 boxen to test on).
I can give you an account on a ppc64 box if that would help... What you've done so far, with the one extra patch I just sent, seems perfectly sufficient to make it cope with SUBARCH defaulting to x86 instead of to i386 or x86_64. Are you happy to push it before you do the rest of the refactoring/moving? -- dwmw2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
