On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 06:32, Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:17:17AM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:13 AM, David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 23:58 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> >> FWIW, the next step (still not pushed there) is to move arch/um/sys-x86 to
>> >> arch/x86/um, with arch/um/os-Linux/sys-x86 becoming arch/x86/um/os-Linux,
>> >> Kconfig.x86 moving to arch/x86/um/Kconfig and Makefile-x86 - to
>> >> arch/x86/um/Makefile.defs. ?Next after that - arch/powerpc/um (and yes,
>> >> it means resurrected uml/ppc port; for now - only ppc32, since I have no
>> >> ppc64 boxen to test on).
>> >
>> > I can give you an account on a ppc64 box if that would help...
>>
>> Isn't UML on ppc broken since ages?
>
> Yes. Resurrected is not the right word here, sorry...
Oh, what a disappointment. I really hoped it was true...
BTW, how much work would it be to port UML to ARM? Would be nice-to-have on
your Android phone, as it can provide a full Linux userspace without
requiring rooting
the phone.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
