On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:44:32PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > >> Fixed and pushed (um-header.git #master); however, looking around that area >> shows more races ;-/ > > Such as, for example, seriously broken handling of free_winch(): delaying > free_irq() until after return from IRQ handler is nice, but not enough - > freeing struct winch itself (or winch->stack, for that matter) is also best > left until after free_irq(). Normal way to do that is schedule_work()... > Fixed and pushed... > > Folks, I don't know what to do with all that stuff; as far as I'm concerned > the ideal variant would be to have functioning git tree maintained by Richard. > Is that possible? I can ask to start pulling um-header.git into linux-next, > but I would very much prefer to avoid that, TYVM... If nothing else, ACK/NAK > on the stuff in there should be done by architecture maintainer(s). >
Sorry for the delay. Writing my theses consumes a lot of my time... I've already started reviewing and testing your changes. Currently they life in my local git repo. But a git.kernel.org repo is on the way! Later I'll submit all changes to akpm. -- Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
