But then there's a fundamental question of whether KVM has similar
semantics.
UML was incredibly useful to my project since it ran a whole "kernel +
processes" in user space.
Now i'm confused as to whether I need to change my work so that it works
with KVM (I'm trying to read thru KVM docs to understand the semantics).
Basically, my project involved redirecting the system calls of one process
to the UML kernel.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Richard RW. Weinberger <
rich...@sigma-star.at> wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >
> >
> > > UML development mostly stopped in favor to KVM.
> >
> >
> > so you mean to say that KVM is preferable to UML?
> > (I Guess it may depend on the situation?)
>
> KVM is *much* faster than UML and *much* less hacky. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel