On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Richard RW. Weinberger <
rich...@sigma-star.at> wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >
> >
> > > UML development mostly stopped in favor to KVM.
> >
> >
> > so you mean to say that KVM is preferable to UML?
> > (I Guess it may depend on the situation?)
>
> KVM is *much* faster than UML and *much* less hacky. :-)
>
>
Indeed, I am developing some functions for the virtual memory subsystem in
the kernel.
Qemu replaces UML in my case. I run qemu without kvm support because I
don't seem to be able to run nested virtualization in virtualbox.
Anyway now Qemu serves me well. :)
Is Jeff Dike still developing UML?
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
> Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
> Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
> _______________________________________________
> User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
> User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
