On 07/02/2013 03:19 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com> wrote:
>> > 'asm-generic' need provide necessary configuration checking, if can't
>> > pass checking, 'asm-generic' shouldn't implement it.
>> >
>> > For 'COMPILE_TEST', according to its help contents, 'asm-generic' need
>> > let it pass configuration checking, and provide related dummy contents
>> > for it.
>> >
>> > Part of 'COMPLE_TEST' help contents in "init/Kconfig":
>> >
>> >   "...Despite they cannot be loaded there (or even when they load they 
>> > cannot be used due to missing HW support)..."
>> >
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com>
> NAKed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>
> 
> Please don't clutter the code with checks for CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST.

Do you mean: 'asm-generic' should not support 'COMPILE_TEST' (the
platform should not support 'COMPILE_TEST") ?

Or you mean: 'COMPILE_TEST' should not exist in kernel ?

Can we use 'asm-default' instead of 'asm-generic', since "if HW support,
it will provide default value, or it will provide nothing" ?


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to