On 07/04/2013 10:03 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 09:49 +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > >> > Hmm... at least, it is neither architectures issue nor modules issue. >> > >> > So we have to look for who have duty for it, since it is a 'generic' >> > issue for many architectures and modules, we have to find it in >> > 'generic' area (e.g. "./include/*"). >> > >> > At least now, it seems only "asm-generic/*" can play the unlucky role !! >> > >> > Or, do you think it is still the modules issue themselves ? > What problem are you trying to solve? asm-generic has been around for a > long time, and so has allmodconfig. I'm unaware of any issues with > either of them. >
Select "COMPILE_TEST=y" with allmodconfig, but can not pass compiling in many architectures, one of the most reasons is "HW does not support". 'asm-generic' is really existent for a long time, and make an important role for both architectures and modules. > But as my last email got blocked because your ISP thinks my ISP is a > spambot (it's road runner, which I'm sure there are spammers), you wont > get this anyway. Oh, sorry for not reply the original mail, and did not see in my backup mail, now, I can use my backup mail to continue. Thanks. -- Chen Gang ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
