On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 04:49:35PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 12.08.2014 16:46, schrieb Vivek Goyal: > > Richard and Daniel reported that UML is broken due to changes to resource > > traversal functions. Problem is that iomem_resource.child can be null > > and new code does not consider that possibility. Old code used a for loop > > and that loop will not even execute if p was null. > > > > Revert back to for() loop logic and bail out if p is null. > > > > I also moved sibling_only check out of resource_lock. There is no > > reason to keep it inside the lock. > > > > Following is backtrace of the UML crash. > > Shall I pickup this patch and route it via my uml tree to Linus?
I am fine with that. Thanks Vivek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
