Am 12.08.2014 17:04, schrieb Vivek Goyal: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 04:49:35PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 12.08.2014 16:46, schrieb Vivek Goyal: >>> Richard and Daniel reported that UML is broken due to changes to resource >>> traversal functions. Problem is that iomem_resource.child can be null >>> and new code does not consider that possibility. Old code used a for loop >>> and that loop will not even execute if p was null. >>> >>> Revert back to for() loop logic and bail out if p is null. >>> >>> I also moved sibling_only check out of resource_lock. There is no >>> reason to keep it inside the lock. >>> >>> Following is backtrace of the UML crash. >> >> Shall I pickup this patch and route it via my uml tree to Linus? > > I am fine with that.
Whoops, I oversaw that your patch does not touch anything in arch/um/. It is not UML specific. Let's see what Andrew says. Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
