On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 02:40:52 +0100, Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-02-02 18:12 -0500, Edward Faulkner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:24:49 -0600, Christopher S. Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > "Sharing Filesystems between Virtual Machines"
> > > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/shared_fs.html
> >
> > COW is great if you want each UML to have it's own independent
> > filesystem, based on the same image.  But it sounds like Andre wants a
> > shared filesystem in which each machine can see each other's changes,
> > in an NFS-like way.
> >
> > Hostfs is probably the way to do this, but I can't vouch for its
> > security.  I'm curious myself.
> 
> Exactly. I know what COW files are and I use them, but this is
> not the problem I'm trying to solve.
> 
> I have UMLs that need read/write access to a relatively large
> amount of on-disk data (tens of GB). The volume of shared data is
> small compared to the volume of non-shared data. COW is designed
> for the opposite situation.
> 
> I could create one 50 GB file for each UML and use it as a ubd
> but that's bound to fail as I don't know in advance how much
> disk space a given UML will need. I'd rather have one big FS and
> have all UMLs share it.
> 
> If I did this with physical machines, I might set up a large
> filesystem on a server and have all the machines mount it over
> NFS. There are so many inherent security risks with NFS,
> however, that I fear that it would nearly negate the security
> advantages of using UMLs.
> 
> AFS, Coda and Intermezzo are possible alternatives but they have
> other drawbacks.
> 
> I'd like to know how hostfs compares, especially with regards to
> security (i.e. how hard is it to use hostfs to break into the
> host).
> 
> --
> Andr� Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
> Do not use this account for regular correspondence.
> See the URL above for contact information.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> User-mode-linux-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
> 

Have you considered using something like lufs or sshfs?  I know that
sshfs can be configured to use commands other than ssh for file
transfer.  Of course, if you're considering either of those options,
you should probably looks at FUSE so that the fs is in userland and
not the kernel.

http://lufs.sourceforge.net/lufs/
http://shfs.sourceforge.net/faq.html
http://fuse.sourceforge.net/

-- 
Raymond Page


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user

Reply via email to