On Tuesday 23 January 2007 10:19, Flavio wrote: > OK!! > > Thank you. > So, I can't get better performances now. > > I'm going to integrate some HPC clustering system to speed up UML even > though I don't know if it's the right way... becouse of the I/O > latency time. It depends on your purpose.
For compilation itself there are distcc or the newer icecc (I'm told by KDE folks it's better and faster, probably because of the use of a central scheduler); for the rest... well, it depends on what you want. We're probably interested in the results, they could be helpful to other people! Bye! -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list! Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
