Me personally, think no. Eric summarized the issues with having it pluggable pretty well- "What would it mean if you allowed NOT labels, and then changed the parameter? Would you treat the labels as illegal?
I don't want to explain to accumulo administrators that they should never turn that switch on to solve their visibility puzzle. I don't want to explain to an investigator that a little used switch was mistakenly used to implement a poor visibility policy that allowed someone to see data they should not have seen." On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:56 AM, joeferner <[email protected]> wrote: > If I were to submit a patch to allow the visibility system to be plug-gable > would that be accepted? Or would it be better to have a configurable option > to just enable/disable the NOT operator? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/NOT-operator-in-visibility-string-tp7949p8350.html > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
