On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:56 AM, joeferner <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I were to submit a patch to allow the visibility system to be plug-gable > would that be accepted? Or would it be better to have a configurable option > to just enable/disable the NOT operator? > I'm opposed to adding an optional not. I think the concept of getting more data by removing authorizations is problematic. I would be interested in seeing a design doc or patch for making it pluggable. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/NOT-operator-in-visibility-string-tp7949p8350.html > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
