I use openjdk8 from Ubuntu 16.04 and Centos 7 packages to run Accumulo
all the time without issue.

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Jayesh Patel <jpa...@keywcorp.com> wrote:
> Accumulo 1.7.0 with HDFS 2.7.1
>
>
>
> I was experimenting with openjdk instead of Oracle JRE for Accumulo and ran
> into this issue.  It seems like because it never transitions from HAVE_LOCK
> to NORMAL, it never gets around to start the thrift server.  Changing back
> to Oracle JRE didn’t make a difference.
>
>
>
> Here’s what I get in the logs for the master:
>
> 2016-12-01 17:01:07,970 [trace.DistributedTrace] INFO : SpanReceiver
> org.apache.accumulo.tracer.ZooTraceCli
>
> ent was loaded successfully.
>
> 2016-12-01 17:01:07,971 [master.Master] INFO : trying to get master lock
>
> 2016-12-01 17:01:07,987 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed from
> INITIAL to HAVE_LOCK
>
> 2016-12-01 17:01:08,038 [master.Master] INFO : New servers:
> [instance-accumulo:9997[258ac79197e000d]]
>
>
>
> On the successful install it transitions right away to NORMAL and goes on
> the listen on port 9999:
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,393 [master.Master] INFO : trying to get master lock
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,408 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed from
> INITIAL to HAVE_LOCK
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,432 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed from
> HAVE_LOCK to NORMAL
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,524 [balancer.TableLoadBalancer] INFO : Loaded class
> org.apache.accumulo.server.master.balancer.DefaultLoadBalancer for table !0
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,631 [master.Master] INFO : Setting master lock data to
> 127.0.0.1:9999
>
>
>
> I found ACCUMULO-4513, but it doesn’t seem relevant as I didn’t try to stop.
>
>
>
> Any ideas as to what is going on?
>
>
>
> HDFS seems fine based on my limited tests with openjdk 1.8.  I did find some
> old posts about Accumulo issues with IBM JDK.  Should I expect Accumulo to
> work with openjdk?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Jayesh
>
>

Reply via email to