I can't be sure why the master is stuck in that state. It could be a bug in 1.7.0. Can you reproduce in 1.7.2?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:56 PM Jayesh Patel <jpa...@keywcorp.com> wrote: > Thank you! > > > > What might be going on with the state transition of the master? Looks > like the tservers can’t talk to the master without the thrift interface. > Is there another interface I can enable on the master? > > > > > > *From:* Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2016 5:34 PM > *To:* firstname.lastname@example.org > *Subject:* Re: openjdk, Accumulo master state doesn't change from > HAVE_LOCK to NORMAL > > > > This issue described doesn't seem related to the JDK. Yes, you should > expect Accumulo to work with OpenJDK. While we don't prescribe a JDK for > users, most of the developers have an interest in ensuring at least OpenJDK > and Oracle JDK work well. A few people care about IBM JDK also, and we > accept contributions to fix issues relevant to IBM JDK. > > Personally, I use OpenJDK 8 exclusively, and haven't seen this issue. > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:24 PM Jayesh Patel <jpa...@keywcorp.com> wrote: > > Accumulo 1.7.0 with HDFS 2.7.1 > > > > I was experimenting with openjdk instead of Oracle JRE for Accumulo and > ran into this issue. It seems like because it never transitions from > HAVE_LOCK to NORMAL, it never gets around to start the thrift server. > Changing back to Oracle JRE didn’t make a difference. > > > > Here’s what I get in the logs for the master: > > 2016-12-01 17:01:07,970 [trace.DistributedTrace] INFO : SpanReceiver > org.apache.accumulo.tracer.ZooTraceCli > > ent was loaded successfully. > > 2016-12-01 17:01:07,971 [master.Master] INFO : trying to get master lock > > 2016-12-01 17:01:07,987 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed > from INITIAL to HAVE_LOCK > > 2016-12-01 17:01:08,038 [master.Master] INFO : New servers: > [instance-accumulo:9997[258ac79197e000d]] > > > > On the successful install it transitions right away to NORMAL and goes on > the listen on port 9999: > > 2015-06-07 17:50:35,393 [master.Master] INFO : trying to get master lock > > 2015-06-07 17:50:35,408 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed > from INITIAL to HAVE_LOCK > > 2015-06-07 17:50:35,432 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed > from HAVE_LOCK to NORMAL > > 2015-06-07 17:50:35,524 [balancer.TableLoadBalancer] INFO : Loaded class > org.apache.accumulo.server.master.balancer.DefaultLoadBalancer for table !0 > > 2015-06-07 17:50:35,631 [master.Master] INFO : Setting master lock data to > 127.0.0.1:9999 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__127.0.0.1-3A9999&d=DQMFaQ&c=31nHN1tvZeuWBT6LwDN4Ngk1qezfsYHyolgGeY2ZhlU&r=yH4vdeYURv2hJ1Gmntk0uc08nV-pgsJRlR6tfCR4KBw&m=PGaErZqBG4ZLhvBF_e2erg7tdil5yjEujZQMiKmp5Uk&s=TagTSNKkbvhsYiu5geGRtorEBK2ghw6Y8KvzKV2OWdE&e=> > > > > I found ACCUMULO-4513 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_ACCUMULO-2D4513&d=DQMFaQ&c=31nHN1tvZeuWBT6LwDN4Ngk1qezfsYHyolgGeY2ZhlU&r=yH4vdeYURv2hJ1Gmntk0uc08nV-pgsJRlR6tfCR4KBw&m=PGaErZqBG4ZLhvBF_e2erg7tdil5yjEujZQMiKmp5Uk&s=SNeP9F29b0ONCVeuddUvGx0xdd8Z3TLD-OxqjZsHa_s&e=>, > but it doesn’t seem relevant as I didn’t try to stop. > > > > Any ideas as to what is going on? > > > > HDFS seems fine based on my limited tests with openjdk 1.8. I did find > some old posts about Accumulo issues with IBM JDK. Should I expect > Accumulo to work with openjdk? > > > > Thank you, > Jayesh > > > >