I can't be sure why the master is stuck in that state. It could be a bug in
1.7.0. Can you reproduce in 1.7.2?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:56 PM Jayesh Patel <jpa...@keywcorp.com> wrote:

> Thank you!
>
>
>
> What might be going on with the state transition of the master?  Looks
> like the tservers can’t talk to the master without the thrift interface.
> Is there another interface I can enable on the master?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2016 5:34 PM
> *To:* user@accumulo.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: openjdk, Accumulo master state doesn't change from
> HAVE_LOCK to NORMAL
>
>
>
> This issue described doesn't seem related to the JDK. Yes, you should
> expect Accumulo to work with OpenJDK. While we don't prescribe a JDK for
> users, most of the developers have an interest in ensuring at least OpenJDK
> and Oracle JDK work well. A few people care about IBM JDK also, and we
> accept contributions to fix issues relevant to IBM JDK.
>
> Personally, I use OpenJDK 8 exclusively, and haven't seen this issue.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:24 PM Jayesh Patel <jpa...@keywcorp.com> wrote:
>
> Accumulo 1.7.0 with HDFS 2.7.1
>
>
>
> I was experimenting with openjdk instead of Oracle JRE for Accumulo and
> ran into this issue.  It seems like because it never transitions from
> HAVE_LOCK to NORMAL, it never gets around to start the thrift server.
> Changing back to Oracle JRE didn’t make a difference.
>
>
>
> Here’s what I get in the logs for the master:
>
> 2016-12-01 17:01:07,970 [trace.DistributedTrace] INFO : SpanReceiver
> org.apache.accumulo.tracer.ZooTraceCli
>
> ent was loaded successfully.
>
> 2016-12-01 17:01:07,971 [master.Master] INFO : trying to get master lock
>
> 2016-12-01 17:01:07,987 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed
> from INITIAL to HAVE_LOCK
>
> 2016-12-01 17:01:08,038 [master.Master] INFO : New servers:
> [instance-accumulo:9997[258ac79197e000d]]
>
>
>
> On the successful install it transitions right away to NORMAL and goes on
> the listen on port 9999:
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,393 [master.Master] INFO : trying to get master lock
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,408 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed
> from INITIAL to HAVE_LOCK
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,432 [master.EventCoordinator] INFO : State changed
> from HAVE_LOCK to NORMAL
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,524 [balancer.TableLoadBalancer] INFO : Loaded class
> org.apache.accumulo.server.master.balancer.DefaultLoadBalancer for table !0
>
> 2015-06-07 17:50:35,631 [master.Master] INFO : Setting master lock data to
> 127.0.0.1:9999
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__127.0.0.1-3A9999&d=DQMFaQ&c=31nHN1tvZeuWBT6LwDN4Ngk1qezfsYHyolgGeY2ZhlU&r=yH4vdeYURv2hJ1Gmntk0uc08nV-pgsJRlR6tfCR4KBw&m=PGaErZqBG4ZLhvBF_e2erg7tdil5yjEujZQMiKmp5Uk&s=TagTSNKkbvhsYiu5geGRtorEBK2ghw6Y8KvzKV2OWdE&e=>
>
>
>
> I found ACCUMULO-4513
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_ACCUMULO-2D4513&d=DQMFaQ&c=31nHN1tvZeuWBT6LwDN4Ngk1qezfsYHyolgGeY2ZhlU&r=yH4vdeYURv2hJ1Gmntk0uc08nV-pgsJRlR6tfCR4KBw&m=PGaErZqBG4ZLhvBF_e2erg7tdil5yjEujZQMiKmp5Uk&s=SNeP9F29b0ONCVeuddUvGx0xdd8Z3TLD-OxqjZsHa_s&e=>,
> but it doesn’t seem relevant as I didn’t try to stop.
>
>
>
> Any ideas as to what is going on?
>
>
>
> HDFS seems fine based on my limited tests with openjdk 1.8.  I did find
> some old posts about Accumulo issues with IBM JDK.  Should I expect
> Accumulo to work with openjdk?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Jayesh
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to