GitHub user pitrou added a comment to the discussion: A new home for 
pyarrow-stubs?

> If we assert that Pandas is a typical downstream user of pyarrow, wouldn't 
> type information be useful there?

Would it? Pandas doesn't seem to have the kind of detailed type information 
that is being proposed here. Here is the `Series` constructor:
https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/b9da66298eff52aa7f6b81f2415153b34149288a/pandas/core/series.py#L364-L371

GitHub link: 
https://github.com/apache/arrow/discussions/45919#discussioncomment-14294771

----
This is an automatically sent email for user@arrow.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: user-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

Reply via email to