GitHub user rok added a comment to the discussion: A new home for pyarrow-stubs?
Thanks for the discussion so far everyone. I think we (can) agree on: * Docs are ok as long as we can automate their maintenance. * We want to start without overloads, with annotations that at least cover data structures but not necessarily the underlying data type (e.g. `pa.Scalar[Any]`). * Types can be narrowed and overloaded in further work if there's need and consensus. I've updated my [draft PR](https://github.com/rok/arrow/pull/45) with this in mind. I've also split the stubs so only about one third are left in the PR to make it easier to review. If there's not strong opposition and we agree on principle I'll open a PR against the main branch and we can discuss implementation details there. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/arrow/discussions/45919#discussioncomment-14385023 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
