Hi. I'm writing Avro implementation in Rust for personal use. I have a question. Consider this Avro scheme:
{ "type": "record", "name": "a.b", "fields": [ { "name": "c", "type": { "type": "record", "name": "d", "fields": [] } } ] } What is fullname of record "c"? "a.c" or "c"? I think Avro specification is vague about this and should be fixed. When I attempt to interpret Avro spec literally, I get to conclusion that the fullname is "a.c". But this contradicts to my common sense. == Askar Safin http://safinaskar.com https://sr.ht/~safinaskar https://github.com/safinaskar