thanks roman and cos.
To summarize, i think we can all agree there are 3 things we can do :

- limit components to stuff we enjoy working on, or stuff others will help
with.
- reach out to hadoop ecosystem communities to get definitive "yes" or "no"
on wether they will help maintain packages.
- focus on automation.  I think everytthing that can be automated, should
be.  lets never do a manual build or test again.

I will create A JIRA to get community feedback from at least one commiter
on each project bigtop currently supports.






On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Looks like it is going slow. so I will continue. To start with...
> >
> > I am proposing the following set of supported platforms (similar to last
> time)
> >
> > OS:
> >   CentOS6, CentOS7, Fedora 20
>
> Should we be really targeting both?
>
> >   SLES12, OpenSUSE 13.1
> >   Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
> >
> > Java:
> >   OpenJDK 7
> >
> > Components:
> >
> >   Zookeeper 3.4.6 (or later?)
> >   Hadoop 2.6.x
> >   HBase 0.98.x (latest; I am not sure if 1.0 will be ready in the 2
> months?)
>
> That's a great question for Andrew.
>
> >   Hive 0.14
> >   Sqoop 1.99.4
> >   Oozie 4.0.1
> >   Giraph 1.1.0
> >   Groovy 2.3
> >   Hue 3.6.0
> >   DataFU 1.0.0
> >   Solr 4.6.0
> >   Crunch 0.10.0
> >   Spark 1.1.0
> >   Phoenix 4.1.0
> >   Tomcat 6.0.36
> >   jsvc 1.0.15
> >   What other new stuff do we feel like adding?
>
> This looks like a reasonable list. How about we put it into the JIRA
> as a current plan of record?
>
> > To retire:
> >   Pig (is there enough interest in the community to keep it on?)
>
> I'd rather keep it.
>
> >   Whirr 0.8.2 (seems to be headed to the Attic)
>
> +1 to dropping it
>
> >   Mahout 0.9 (unless we have a version working w/ Hadoop 2)
>
> It seems Mahout has migrated to SPARK 100%. If that
> works -- I'd be interested in maintaining it.
>
> >   Flume 1.5.0.1 (the project seems to be winding down?)
>
> Flume still seems to be pretty widely used and historically
> it hasn't caused us that much trouble. Keeping?
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>



-- 
jay vyas

Reply via email to