Great! Okay +1 to that. I agree . I wonder ... Should we invite them to have a face to face meetup with us , I.e.... A "bigtop summit" ? Possibly in either California (where most of the Hadoop community is) or in maybe boston?
I think having some face time with members of the community might be a better way to really forge a strong collaborative alliance. > On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:19AM, jay vyas wrote: >> thanks roman and cos. >> To summarize, i think we can all agree there are 3 things we can do : >> >> - limit components to stuff we enjoy working on, or stuff others will help >> with. >> - reach out to hadoop ecosystem communities to get definitive "yes" or "no" >> on wether they will help maintain packages. >> - focus on automation. I think everytthing that can be automated, should >> be. lets never do a manual build or test again. >> >> I will create A JIRA to get community feedback from at least one commiter >> on each project bigtop currently supports. > > That be great, Jay! > > Let's it make it clear that they don't need to support the packaging for their > components - after all that's what we here are experts in doing. Instead it'd > be great for all our users if our upstream components become more active in > incorporating Bigtop as a their official go-nogo release gate. For that we > need to make Bigtop to be much easier for a layman to use, and that's exactly > what we are focusing in 0.9, I guess. > > Makes sense? > Cos > >> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Looks like it is going slow. so I will continue. To start with... >>>> >>>> I am proposing the following set of supported platforms (similar to last >>> time) >>>> >>>> OS: >>>> CentOS6, CentOS7, Fedora 20 >>> >>> Should we be really targeting both? >>> >>>> SLES12, OpenSUSE 13.1 >>>> Ubuntu 14.04 LTS >>>> >>>> Java: >>>> OpenJDK 7 >>>> >>>> Components: >>>> >>>> Zookeeper 3.4.6 (or later?) >>>> Hadoop 2.6.x >>>> HBase 0.98.x (latest; I am not sure if 1.0 will be ready in the 2 >>> months?) >>> >>> That's a great question for Andrew. >>> >>>> Hive 0.14 >>>> Sqoop 1.99.4 >>>> Oozie 4.0.1 >>>> Giraph 1.1.0 >>>> Groovy 2.3 >>>> Hue 3.6.0 >>>> DataFU 1.0.0 >>>> Solr 4.6.0 >>>> Crunch 0.10.0 >>>> Spark 1.1.0 >>>> Phoenix 4.1.0 >>>> Tomcat 6.0.36 >>>> jsvc 1.0.15 >>>> What other new stuff do we feel like adding? >>> >>> This looks like a reasonable list. How about we put it into the JIRA >>> as a current plan of record? >>> >>>> To retire: >>>> Pig (is there enough interest in the community to keep it on?) >>> >>> I'd rather keep it. >>> >>>> Whirr 0.8.2 (seems to be headed to the Attic) >>> >>> +1 to dropping it >>> >>>> Mahout 0.9 (unless we have a version working w/ Hadoop 2) >>> >>> It seems Mahout has migrated to SPARK 100%. If that >>> works -- I'd be interested in maintaining it. >>> >>>> Flume 1.5.0.1 (the project seems to be winding down?) >>> >>> Flume still seems to be pretty widely used and historically >>> it hasn't caused us that much trouble. Keeping? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Roman. >> >> >> >> -- >> jay vyas
