Hi guys, I'm just an observer, a passer-by you might say (for now) of this mailing list, so I hope you won't mind me commenting on this. I was planning to use Hadoop with Mahout in my thesis, so this thread kind of freaked me out. Since you are mentioning the two pieces of software are incompatible - does that mean it is not possible to get them to work together, or just that it requires some extra effort? Also, there are some algorithms that work with Spark - do you know whether those still work with recent versions of Spark? Is there a lot of work to manually install Mahout without Bigtop?
Anyhow, hope the Mahout guys find their focus again. Best regards, David On Thursday, March 12, 2015, jay vyas <[email protected]> wrote: > okay, lets drop it... Im fine with that. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> But the last time, back in 0.8, we found that runtime is pretty broken. >> So, is >> there any real reason to keep on pushing an incompatible piece of >> software? >> >> Cos >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:42AM, jay vyas wrote: >> > At this point we can just keep packaging as is, but if bugs crop up, >> drop >> > it unless we can get help >> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Should read >> > >> > So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout OR a thing of similar >> > nature? >> > >> > Sorry >> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> > > So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout and a thing of >> similar >> > nature? >> > >> > > >> > > Cos >> > > >> > > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 02:13AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> > > > I think it eventually boils down to who will be maintaining the >> > component. >> > > > >> > > > As Jay said - there's maintainer for the component and if it >> will >> > continue >> > > > like this we might have no choice but delete it: I think right >> now >> > it blocks >> > > > the release. >> > > > >> > > > Cos >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:29PM, Ed - 0x1b wrote: >> > > > > some links to some of Mahout's replacements - not all Apache >> > projects. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/apache-mahout-hadoops-original-machine-learning-project-is-moving-on-from-mapreduce/ >> > > > > http://0xdata.com/ >> > > > > https://spark.apache.org/mllib/ >> > > > > >> > >> https://databricks.com/blog/2014/06/30/sparkling-water-h20-spark.html >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/mahout/tree/master/h2o >> > > > > >> > > > > and >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/cloudera-is-rebuilding-machine-learning-for-hadoop-with-oryx/ >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >> > <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> wrote: >> > > > > > Thanks man! I've heard that there's a new project that >> picks up >> > where Mahout >> > > > > > left of wrt Hadoop2.x support. But might be I am just >> delusional >> > from >> > > > > > hunger...? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:32PM, jay vyas wrote: >> > > > > >>A A i sent a email to mahout-dev... maybe someone will >> ping >> > back :) >> > > > > >>A A On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jay Vyas >> > <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> > > > > >>A A wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>A A A Iirc we don't have any maintainers for it. >> > > > > >>A A A Is anyone interested in maintaining it? >> > > > > >>A A A > On Mar 6, 2015, at 2:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >> > <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> wrote: >> > > > > >>A A A > >> > > > > >>A A A > Does anyone know what's the story with Mahout? >> Has it >> > been fixed to be >> > > > > >>A A A working >> > > > > >>A A A > with Hadoop2 or shall we remove it from the BOM? >> > > > > >>A A A > >> > > > > >>A A A > Cos >> > > > > >>A A A > >> > > > > >>A A A >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:56PM, Konstantin >> Boudnik >> > wrote: >> > > > > >>A A A >> Guys, >> > > > > >>A A A >> >> > > > > >>A A A >> It'd be great if we can have the next release >> ready >> > by ApacheCon in >> > > > > >>A A A April. >> > > > > >>A A A >> Think about all the PR and publicity we can get >> > without any effort on >> > > > > >>A A A our own. >> > > > > >>A A A >> And perhaps from the tactical standpoint we >> shall >> > call this release >> > > > > >>A A A 1.0? >> > > > > >>A A A >> >> > > > > >>A A A >> I believe the only major hurdle between us and >> the >> > release is CI. >> > > > > >>A A A Roman, I >> > > > > >>A A A >> understand you're busy elsewhere, but could you >> > please let us know >> > > > > >>A A A what else >> > > > > >>A A A >> needs to be done before we can start doing the >> > regular builds and how >> > > > > >>A A A the >> > > > > >>A A A >> community can help. That's the highest >> priority, >> > IMO. >> > > > > >>A A A >> >> > > > > >>A A A >> There a couple of the tickets left >> > unfixed/unassigned on BIGTOP-1480, >> > > > > >>A A A and if >> > > > > >>A A A >> they aren't resolved on time we can move them >> > farther. There's lesser >> > > > > >>A A A than a >> > > > > >>A A A >> half-dozen blockers and none of them look too >> big, >> > honestly. And we >> > > > > >>A A A have a >> > > > > >>A A A >> whole lot of active committers and >> contributors to >> > wrap-up the >> > > > > >>A A A release in a >> > > > > >>A A A >> couple of weeks. >> > > > > >>A A A >> >> > > > > >>A A A >> Do we want to try upgrade to HBase 1.x for this >> > release or it might >> > > > > >>A A A be too big >> > > > > >>A A A >> of a distortion? Andrew, what do you think and >> do >> > you have cycles to >> > > > > >>A A A do that? >> > > > > >>A A A >> >> > > > > >>A A A >> What else we need to get done for this release? >> > Suggestions? >> > > > > >>A A A >> >> > > > > >>A A A >> Is there anyone who wants to step up as the RM >> this >> > time around? RM >> > > > > >>A A A doesn't >> > > > > >>A A A >> mean that you have to do all the job, but >> rather be >> > an efficient with >> > > > > >>A A A a stick ;) >> > > > > >>A A A >> >> > > > > >>A A A >> Thoughts? >> > > > > >>A A A >>AA Cos >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>A A -- >> > > > > >>A A jay vyas >> > >> > -- >> > jay vyas >> > > > > -- > jay vyas >
