Hi David, What parts of Mahout do you need for your thesis? I'm familiar with Spark's MLLlib and maybe I can point out the equivalent parts.
RJ On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:57 AM, David Starina <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm just an observer, a passer-by you might say (for now) of this mailing > list, so I hope you won't mind me commenting on this. I was planning to use > Hadoop with Mahout in my thesis, so this thread kind of freaked me out. > Since you are mentioning the two pieces of software are incompatible - does > that mean it is not possible to get them to work together, or just that it > requires some extra effort? Also, there are some algorithms that work with > Spark - do you know whether those still work with recent versions of Spark? > Is there a lot of work to manually install Mahout without Bigtop? > > Anyhow, hope the Mahout guys find their focus again. > > Best regards, > David > > > On Thursday, March 12, 2015, jay vyas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> okay, lets drop it... Im fine with that. >> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> But the last time, back in 0.8, we found that runtime is pretty broken. >>> So, is >>> there any real reason to keep on pushing an incompatible piece of >>> software? >>> >>> Cos >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:42AM, jay vyas wrote: >>> > At this point we can just keep packaging as is, but if bugs crop >>> up, drop >>> > it unless we can get help >>> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected] >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Should read >>> > >>> > So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout OR a thing of similar >>> > nature? >>> > >>> > Sorry >>> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> > > So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout and a thing of >>> similar >>> > nature? >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Cos >>> > > >>> > > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 02:13AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> > > > I think it eventually boils down to who will be maintaining >>> the >>> > component. >>> > > > >>> > > > As Jay said - there's maintainer for the component and if it >>> will >>> > continue >>> > > > like this we might have no choice but delete it: I think >>> right now >>> > it blocks >>> > > > the release. >>> > > > >>> > > > Cos >>> > > > >>> > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:29PM, Ed - 0x1b wrote: >>> > > > > some links to some of Mahout's replacements - not all Apache >>> > projects. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > >>> https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/apache-mahout-hadoops-original-machine-learning-project-is-moving-on-from-mapreduce/ >>> > > > > http://0xdata.com/ >>> > > > > https://spark.apache.org/mllib/ >>> > > > > >>> > >>> https://databricks.com/blog/2014/06/30/sparkling-water-h20-spark.html >>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/mahout/tree/master/h2o >>> > > > > >>> > > > > and >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > >>> https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/cloudera-is-rebuilding-machine-learning-for-hadoop-with-oryx/ >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > > Thanks man! I've heard that there's a new project that >>> picks up >>> > where Mahout >>> > > > > > left of wrt Hadoop2.x support. But might be I am just >>> delusional >>> > from >>> > > > > > hunger...? >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:32PM, jay vyas wrote: >>> > > > > >>A A i sent a email to mahout-dev... maybe someone will >>> ping >>> > back :) >>> > > > > >>A A On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jay Vyas >>> > <[email protected]> >>> > > > > >>A A wrote: >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>A A A Iirc we don't have any maintainers for it. >>> > > > > >>A A A Is anyone interested in maintaining it? >>> > > > > >>A A A > On Mar 6, 2015, at 2:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > >>A A A > >>> > > > > >>A A A > Does anyone know what's the story with Mahout? >>> Has it >>> > been fixed to be >>> > > > > >>A A A working >>> > > > > >>A A A > with Hadoop2 or shall we remove it from the >>> BOM? >>> > > > > >>A A A > >>> > > > > >>A A A > Cos >>> > > > > >>A A A > >>> > > > > >>A A A >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:56PM, Konstantin >>> Boudnik >>> > wrote: >>> > > > > >>A A A >> Guys, >>> > > > > >>A A A >> >>> > > > > >>A A A >> It'd be great if we can have the next release >>> ready >>> > by ApacheCon in >>> > > > > >>A A A April. >>> > > > > >>A A A >> Think about all the PR and publicity we can >>> get >>> > without any effort on >>> > > > > >>A A A our own. >>> > > > > >>A A A >> And perhaps from the tactical standpoint we >>> shall >>> > call this release >>> > > > > >>A A A 1.0? >>> > > > > >>A A A >> >>> > > > > >>A A A >> I believe the only major hurdle between us >>> and the >>> > release is CI. >>> > > > > >>A A A Roman, I >>> > > > > >>A A A >> understand you're busy elsewhere, but could >>> you >>> > please let us know >>> > > > > >>A A A what else >>> > > > > >>A A A >> needs to be done before we can start doing the >>> > regular builds and how >>> > > > > >>A A A the >>> > > > > >>A A A >> community can help. That's the highest >>> priority, >>> > IMO. >>> > > > > >>A A A >> >>> > > > > >>A A A >> There a couple of the tickets left >>> > unfixed/unassigned on BIGTOP-1480, >>> > > > > >>A A A and if >>> > > > > >>A A A >> they aren't resolved on time we can move them >>> > farther. There's lesser >>> > > > > >>A A A than a >>> > > > > >>A A A >> half-dozen blockers and none of them look too >>> big, >>> > honestly. And we >>> > > > > >>A A A have a >>> > > > > >>A A A >> whole lot of active committers and >>> contributors to >>> > wrap-up the >>> > > > > >>A A A release in a >>> > > > > >>A A A >> couple of weeks. >>> > > > > >>A A A >> >>> > > > > >>A A A >> Do we want to try upgrade to HBase 1.x for >>> this >>> > release or it might >>> > > > > >>A A A be too big >>> > > > > >>A A A >> of a distortion? Andrew, what do you think >>> and do >>> > you have cycles to >>> > > > > >>A A A do that? >>> > > > > >>A A A >> >>> > > > > >>A A A >> What else we need to get done for this >>> release? >>> > Suggestions? >>> > > > > >>A A A >> >>> > > > > >>A A A >> Is there anyone who wants to step up as the >>> RM this >>> > time around? RM >>> > > > > >>A A A doesn't >>> > > > > >>A A A >> mean that you have to do all the job, but >>> rather be >>> > an efficient with >>> > > > > >>A A A a stick ;) >>> > > > > >>A A A >> >>> > > > > >>A A A >> Thoughts? >>> > > > > >>A A A >>AA Cos >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>A A -- >>> > > > > >>A A jay vyas >>> > >>> > -- >>> > jay vyas >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> jay vyas >> >
