That's for sure not much. Your rdbms can probably hold the entire dataset in memory, and you can do all kinds for queries that you want. Cassandra is for some very specific use cases. If you really need a cluster, have you thought about MySQL Cluster?
2012/1/25 <francesco.tangari....@gmail.com> > Standard analysis, display or aggregate some rows > or standard operations that i can do on a normal dbms > > -- > francesco.tangari....@gmail.com > Inviato con Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig> > > Il giorno mercoledì 25 gennaio 2012, alle ore 04.26, Maxim Potekhin ha > scritto: > > You provide zero information on what you are planning to do with the data. > Thus, your question is impossible to answer. > > > On 1/24/2012 9:38 PM, francesco.tangari....@gmail.com wrote: > > Do you think that for a standard project with 50.000.000 of rows on 2-3 > machines cassandra is appropriate > or i should use a normal dbms? > > -- > francesco.tangari....@gmail.com > Inviato con Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig> > > > >
