make example of cases please? -- francesco.tangari....@gmail.com Inviato con Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
Il giorno mercoledì 25 gennaio 2012, alle ore 05.29, Gustavo Gustavo ha scritto: > That's for sure not much. > Your rdbms can probably hold the entire dataset in memory, and you can do all > kinds for queries that you want. Cassandra is for some very specific use > cases. > If you really need a cluster, have you thought about MySQL Cluster? > > 2012/1/25 <francesco.tangari....@gmail.com > (mailto:francesco.tangari....@gmail.com)> > > Standard analysis, display or aggregate some rows > > or standard operations that i can do on a normal dbms > > > > > > -- > > francesco.tangari....@gmail.com (mailto:francesco.tangari....@gmail.com) > > Inviato con Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) > > > > > > Il giorno mercoledì 25 gennaio 2012, alle ore 04.26, Maxim Potekhin ha > > scritto: > > > > > You provide zero information on what you are planning to do with the data. > > > Thus, your question is impossible to answer. > > > > > > > > > On 1/24/2012 9:38 PM, francesco.tangari....@gmail.com > > > (mailto:francesco.tangari....@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > Do you think that for a standard project with 50.000.000 of rows on 2-3 > > > > machines cassandra is appropriate > > > > or i should use a normal dbms? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > francesco.tangari....@gmail.com (mailto:francesco.tangari....@gmail.com) > > > > Inviato con Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) > > > > > > > > > >
