As far as I'm aware, yes. I recall hearing someone mention tying system tables to a particular disk but at the moment that doesn't exist.
On Fri., 17 Aug. 2018, 01:04 Eric Evans, <john.eric.ev...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:23 AM kurt greaves <k...@instaclustr.com> wrote: > > Yep. It might require a full node replace depending on what data is lost > from the system tables. In some cases you might be able to recover from > partially lost system info, but it's not a sure thing. > > Ugh, does it really just boil down to what part of `system` happens to > be on the disk in question? In my mind, that makes the only sane > operational procedure for a failed disk to be: "replace the entire > node". IOW, I don't think we can realistically claim you can survive > a failed a JBOD device if it relies on happenstance. > > > On Wed., 15 Aug. 2018, 17:55 Christian Lorenz, < > christian.lor...@webtrekk.com> wrote: > >> > >> Thank you for the answers. We are using the current version 3.11.3 So > this one includes CASSANDRA-6696. > >> > >> So if I get this right, losing system tables will need a full node > rebuild. Otherwise repair will get the node consistent again. > > > > [ ... ] > > -- > Eric Evans > john.eric.ev...@gmail.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@cassandra.apache.org > >
