That's what nodetool assassinte will do.

On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 10:19 PM David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it possible for me to remove the node from the cluster i.e. to undo
> this mess and get the cluster operating again?
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 7:13 AM Carlos Diaz <crdiaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You can leave it in the seed list of the other nodes, just make sure it's
>> not included in this node's seed list.  However, if you do decide to fix
>> the issue with the racks first assassinate this node (nodetool assassinate
>> <ip>), and update the rack name before you restart.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 10:06 PM David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It is also in the seeds list for the other nodes. Should I remove it
>>> from those, restart them one at a time, then restart it?
>>>
>>> /etc/cassandra # grep -i bootstrap *
>>> doesn't show anything so I don't think I have auto_bootstrap false.
>>>
>>> Thanks very much for the help.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 7:01 AM Carlos Diaz <crdiaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just remove it from the seed list in the cassandra.yaml file and
>>>> restart the node.  Make sure that auto_bootstrap is set to true first
>>>> though.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:59 PM David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So likely because I made it a seed node when I added it to the cluster
>>>>> it didn't do the bootstrap process. How can I recover this?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 6:41 AM David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes replication factor is 3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I ran nodetool repair -pr on all the nodes (one at a time) and am
>>>>>> still having issues getting data back from queries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did make the new node a seed node.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Re "rack4": I assumed that was just an indication as to the physical
>>>>>> location of the server for redundancy. This one is separate from the 
>>>>>> others
>>>>>> so I used rack4.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 6:30 AM Carlos Diaz <crdiaz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm assuming that your replication factor is 3.  If that's the case,
>>>>>>> did you intentionally put this node in rack 4?  Typically, you want to 
>>>>>>> add
>>>>>>> nodes in multiples of your replication factor in order to keep the 
>>>>>>> "racks"
>>>>>>> balanced.  In other words, this node should have been added to rack 1, 
>>>>>>> 2 or
>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having said that, you should be able to easily fix your problem by
>>>>>>> running a nodetool repair -pr on the new node.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 8:16 PM David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I recently added a node to my 3 node Cassandra 4.0.5 cluster and
>>>>>>>> now many reads are not returning rows! What do I need to do to fix 
>>>>>>>> this?
>>>>>>>> There weren't any errors in the logs or other problems that I could 
>>>>>>>> see. I
>>>>>>>> expected the cluster to balance itself but this hasn't happened 
>>>>>>>> (yet?). The
>>>>>>>> nodes are similar so I have num_tokens=256 for each. I am using the
>>>>>>>> Murmur3Partitioner.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # nodetool status
>>>>>>>> Datacenter: dc1
>>>>>>>> ===============
>>>>>>>> Status=Up/Down
>>>>>>>> |/ State=Normal/Leaving/Joining/Moving
>>>>>>>> --  Address          Load       Tokens  Owns (effective)  Host ID
>>>>>>>>                             Rack
>>>>>>>> UN  xxx.xxx.xxx.105  2.65 TiB   256     72.9%
>>>>>>>> afd02287-3f88-4c6f-8b27-06f7a8192402  rack3
>>>>>>>> UN  xxx.xxx.xxx.253  2.6 TiB    256     73.9%
>>>>>>>> e1af72be-e5df-4c6b-a124-c7bc48c6602a  rack2
>>>>>>>> UN  xxx.xxx.xxx.24   93.82 KiB  256     80.0%
>>>>>>>> c4e8b4a0-f014-45e6-afb4-648aad4f8500  rack4
>>>>>>>> UN  xxx.xxx.xxx.107  2.65 TiB   256     73.2%
>>>>>>>> ab72f017-be96-41d2-9bef-a551dec2c7b5  rack1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # nodetool netstats
>>>>>>>> Mode: NORMAL
>>>>>>>> Not sending any streams.
>>>>>>>> Read Repair Statistics:
>>>>>>>> Attempted: 0
>>>>>>>> Mismatch (Blocking): 0
>>>>>>>> Mismatch (Background): 0
>>>>>>>> Pool Name                    Active   Pending      Completed
>>>>>>>> Dropped
>>>>>>>> Large messages                  n/a         0          71754
>>>>>>>>   0
>>>>>>>> Small messages                  n/a         0        8398184
>>>>>>>>  14
>>>>>>>> Gossip messages                 n/a         0        1303634
>>>>>>>>   0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # nodetool ring
>>>>>>>> Datacenter: dc1
>>>>>>>> ==========
>>>>>>>> Address               Rack        Status State   Load
>>>>>>>>  Owns                Token
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                  9189523899826545641
>>>>>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.24        rack4       Up     Normal  93.82 KiB
>>>>>>>> 79.95%              -9194674091837769168
>>>>>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.107       rack1       Up     Normal  2.65 TiB
>>>>>>>>  73.25%              -9168781258594813088
>>>>>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.253       rack2       Up     Normal  2.6 TiB
>>>>>>>> 73.92%              -9163037340977721917
>>>>>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.105       rack3       Up     Normal  2.65 TiB
>>>>>>>>  72.88%              -9148860739730046229
>>>>>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.107       rack1       Up     Normal  2.65 TiB
>>>>>>>>  73.25%              -9125240034139323535
>>>>>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.253       rack2       Up     Normal  2.6 TiB
>>>>>>>> 73.92%              -9112518853051755414
>>>>>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.105       rack3       Up     Normal  2.65 TiB
>>>>>>>>  72.88%              -9100516173422432134
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is causing a serious production issue. Please help if you can.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to