On Aug 15, 2005, at 4:15 PM, Ralf Joachim wrote:
Personaly I don't think that introduction of a <fieldset> element is
neccessary, instead we may omit the <map-to> element. If the <map-to>
element is omited the <class> may be treated like your suggested
<fieldset>. Having said that I didn't check if this is possible yet.
Interesting idea. Does this mean that extending a class without <map-
to> element would evaluete to fields in the extending class?
If you like to continue this discussion i suggest to open an issue in
jira as an enhancement request. You may also connect to
irc://irc.codehaus.org/castor to share your ideas.
OK, I'll try that. Thanks for the Info!
Henk
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
