HI Gregory,
Thanks for your mail. Yes I posting the same again and again to get some
help.
Actually all mapping is working fine without schema validation. But when I
set following properties for validation, it is throwing this error.
But I am not able to find it out.
org.exolab.castor.parser.validation=true
org.exolab.castor.parser.namespaces=true
org.exolab.castor.sax.features=http://xml.org/sax/features/validation,http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema,http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema-full-checking
Thanks And Regards,
Jitesh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Block" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML][Mapping] Error: unable to find
FieldDescriptor when validation on
I've seen this post several times, and have noticed that nobody else
seems to be saying anything...
On 18 Aug 2005, at 09:02, Kalyani Jitesh wrote:
<field name="loggerList" collection="map" get-method="getLoggerList"
set-method="addLogger" type="TMLogger">
First point: I'm not familiar with maps, so I don't know if that will
have an impact. I wasn't of the opinion that they could be used this
way - someone will have to clarify.
<bind-xml name="logger" location="logging"/>
Second: Not sure if that's enough to just say logging - thought you
wanted logging/logger here. Don't know if you've already examined that,
however.
<class name="TMLogger">
<field name="name" type="string">
<bind-xml name="name" node="attribute"/>
</field>
<field name="boundryLevel" type="string">
<bind-xml name="boundrylevel" node="attribute"/>
</field>
</class>
</mapping>
And again, I have no idea how this would ever be mapped to a name/ value
pair on map. Don't you really want a List-based collection, rather than
a map, for this?
Anyways, someone more familiar with the XML side will need to answer
those questions for you. I imagine your first problem is in incorrect
use of the location attribute, and maybe that will solve your problems -
I honestly don't know. The use of a map seems odd, to me, but who
knows - maybe that's what's intended.
Best of luck.
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to
the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
