Hi Keith, answers below... On 9/27/05, Keith Visco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as I understand it, qualified and unqualified indicate which > namespace an element belongs to, not whether or not it should have a > prefix. that's not completely correct. "Qualified" means every subelement must have a namespace prefix. "Unqualified" means no subelement is allowed to have a namespace prefix which relatively indicates that subelement belongs to the namespace of its parent.
So you can have an unprefixed element which is still qualified > with the default namespace declaration. if you have an unprefixed local element, not parent, this says your xml is unqualified. You can also have a prefixed > element which is unqualified by having a prefix which maps to an empty > namespace. each subelement which is prefixed by a namespace refers to an qualified message. here the critical part is we only focus on subelements so that we make a conclusion if an xml is qualified. please look at this document from w3c.org to get familiar with this issues. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#NS what amazes me is that no one else was concerned about this issue before. before sending the complete case I just wanna learn how castor handles this qualification/unqualification issue. Thanks in advance, mesut > > In any case, it sounds like there may be a bug here. Can you provide a > small, but complete example which I could look at further. > > Thanks, > > --Keith > > Mesut Celik wrote: > > Thats the root element: > > > > <xs:schema xmlns:xs=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema > > xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance > > xmlns:soapenv=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ > > xmlns:soapenc=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/ > > xmlns:tns="urn:dslforum-org:cwmp-1-0" > > xmlns:cwmp="urn:dslforum-org:cwmp-1-0" > > xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"; > > targetNamespace="urn:dslforum-org:cwmp-1-0" > > elementFormDefault="unqualified" > > attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> > > > > That's my element definition: > > > > <xs:element name="Inform"> > > <xs:complexType> > > <xs:sequence> > > <xs:element name="Event" type="tns:Event"/> > > </xs:sequence> > > </xs:complexType> > > </xs:element> > > > > thats a complextype for the Event: > > > > <xs:complexType name="Event"> > > <xs:sequence> > > <xs:element name="EventStruct" type="tns:EventStruct" minOccurs="1" > > maxOccurs="16"/> > > </xs:sequence> > > <xs:attribute ref="soapenc:arrayType" /> //This part added > > </xs:complexType> > > > > Normally I would expect that serialized form of Inform Element is > > unqualified which means that all the subelements of Inform element > > must not have namespace prefix. however castor puts this namespace > > prefix always in front of the for example Event element. > > <cwmp:Inform > > > <cwmp:Event soap:arrayType="EventStruct[2]"> > > <cwmp:EventStruct> > > <EventCode>4 VALUE CHANGE</EventCode> > > <CommandKey></CommandKey> > > </cwmp:EventStruct> > > </cwmp:Event> > > </cwmp:Inform> > > > > Maybe the reason is Event has a global complex type definition which > > conflicts with Event element definition inside the Inform complex-type > > definition. > > > > I hope everything is clear. I can give more information in case of > > confusion... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/26/05, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Mesut, > >> > >>can you please include the relevant parts of the XML Schema instance you > >>are using, i.e. at least the root element ? > >> > >>Thanks > >>Werner > >> > >> > >>________________________________ > >> > >> From: Mesut Celik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 4:39 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [castor-user] Re: elementFormDefault is not working in > >>unqualified mode > >> > >> > >> please respond your opinions. > >> any idea would be appreciated. > >> > >> regards, > >> mesut > >> > >> > >> On 9/16/05, Mesut Celik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have a xml schema in which i defined > >>"elementFormDefault" as "unqualified". I use this schema to generate > >>java object model which we use in our protocol layer. > >> however, I saw that after marshalling operation, castor > >>qualifies all the local elements although elementFormDefault is > >>unqualified. > >> > >> what can be the cause of the problem? Im using a binding > >>file but I didnt see anything accidently change the default behaviour. > >> > >> any help appreciated!... > >> mesut > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------- > >>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please > >>send an empty message to the following address: > >> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please > > send an empty message to the following address: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please > send an empty message to the following address: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
