AHA! Yeah I am trying to go from Java->XML and get the same level of validation that you would get when you go form XML->JAVA.
We are already exploring adding in our own validation step. I was just hoping to leverage anything that castor provided. thanks Danny On 10/13/05, Stephen Bash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Danny- > > Are you validating during xml->java or java->xml? The properties given > tell the xml parser to validate against a given schema, but during > java->xml, I don't believe the parser is utilized (there might be an > option that I don't know about). My first idea would be to generate the > xml from the java objects, and then run that xml through a validating > parser to determine if the xml conforms to the schema. > > I should mention that I don't use the source generator much at all, so > there may be options in there to help with validation that I don't know > about. > > Stephen > > > Danny Collins wrote: > > OK - popped those attributes into my properties file - regenerated the > > source code and the fed the objects a ton of invalid data - mainly > > strings that are WAY too long and should fail validation and will if I > > do > > > > I've attached my castor properties file. > > > > I am trying to validate an individual object in the castor graph - > > that is a piece of the schema. > > > > do I need to build out the entire object graph in order for it to > > validate correctly? > > > > Thanks again, you all are being very helpful! > > Danny > > > > On 10/13/05, Danny Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>SWEET! Thanks for pointing this out. I am going to give it a go > >>straight away and let you know if it works out for me! > >> > >>Thanks again guys. > >> > >>On 10/13/05, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>Yes, as recently added to the XML F.A.Q. (though not released yet): > >>> > >>><p>To enable XML validation at the parser level, please add properties > >>>to your > >>><tt>castor.properties</tt> file as follows:</p> > >>> > >>><code> > >>> org.exolab.castor.parser.namespaces=true > >>> > >>>org.exolab.castor.sax.features=http://xml.org/sax/features/validation,\ > >>> > >>>http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema,\ > >>> > >>>http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema-full-checking > >>></code> > >>> > >>><p>Please note that the example given relies on the use of Apache > >>>Xerces, hence the > >>><tt>apache.org</tt> properties; similar options should exist for other > >>>parsers.</p> > >>> > >>> > >>>I hope this helps > >>>Werner > >>> > >>>wg> -----Original Message----- > >>>wg> From: Danny Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>wg> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 3:49 PM > >>>wg> To: [email protected] > >>>wg> Subject: Re: [castor-user] Schema Validation > >>>wg> > >>>wg> My original thought was that a call to validate prior to > >>>wg> Marshal would work. But that doesn't seem to do anything. > >>>wg> Then I found a reference to a property in the > >>>wg> castor.properties file called > >>>wg> > >>>wg> org.exolab.castor.marshalling.validation > >>>wg> > >>>wg> that I have tried with true and false to no avail. > >>>wg> > >>>wg> Any thing else that I should know about? > >>>wg> > >>>wg> > >>>wg> TIA > >>>wg> Danny > >>>wg> > >>>wg> On 10/13/05, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>wg> > Danny, > >>>wg> > > >>>wg> > No, you are not. How are you instructing the XML parser > >>>wg> (via Castor) > >>>wg> > to use XML Schema validation ? > >>>wg> > > >>>wg> > Werner > >>>wg> > > >>>wg> > wg> -----Original Message----- > >>>wg> > wg> From: Danny Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>wg> > wg> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 1:35 PM > >>>wg> > wg> To: [email protected] > >>>wg> > wg> Subject: [castor-user] Schema Validation > >>>wg> > wg> > >>>wg> > wg> Hello, > >>>wg> > wg> > >>>wg> > wg> I seem to be having problems getting the my objects validated > >>>wg> > wg> against the schema - it seems to be able to tell me if I am > >>>wg> > wg> missing required objects, but it doesn't seem to be able to > >>>wg> > wg> validate other restrictions like maxlength. Am I > >>>wg> misinterpreting > >>>wg> > wg> the validation abilities? > >>>wg> > wg> > >>>wg> > wg> > >>>wg> > wg> TIA > >>>wg> > wg> Danny > >>>wg> > wg> > >>>wg> > wg> ------------------------------------------------- > >>>wg> > wg> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please > >>>wg> send an empty > >>>wg> > wg> message to the following address: > >>>wg> > wg> > >>>wg> > wg> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>wg> > wg> ------------------------------------------------- > >>>wg> > wg> > >>>wg> > wg> > >>>wg> > > >>>wg> > ------------------------------------------------- > >>>wg> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty > >>>wg> > message to the following address: > >>>wg> > > >>>wg> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>wg> > ------------------------------------------------- > >>>wg> > > >>>wg> > > >>>wg> > >>>wg> ------------------------------------------------- > >>>wg> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an > >>>wg> empty message to the following address: > >>>wg> > >>>wg> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>wg> ------------------------------------------------- > >>>wg> > >>>wg> > >>> > >>>------------------------------------------------- > >>>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please > >>>send an empty message to the following address: > >>> > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please > > send an empty message to the following address: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please > send an empty message to the following address: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
