Werner, Thanks for the update. Is that a schema gen flag or a runtime flag?
Ron On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ronald, > > yes, this is a bug with 'sequence validation', indeed. As mentioned in > the Jira issue itself, there's a work around available that you could > use whilst we work on the resolution of this. > > Regards > Werner > > Ronald R. DiFrango wrote: > > Werner, > > > > Bug 2313 [http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-2313] was created and I > > have attached a test case. I put a note in the code, but I am not using > > any mapping file, but I am just using the CodeGen taks to generate the > > code from the XSD. > > > > Ron > > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Werner Guttmann > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Ronald, > > > > there's a XML HOW-TO that details what we'd like to see. > > > > Werner > > > > Ronald R. DiFrango wrote: > > > Werner, > > > > > > Will do! It is definitely an issue for us. Are the files > attached > > > below enough? > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Werner Guttmann > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> > > wrote: > > > > > > Not sure, Ronald. Let me have a look in detail. Can I please > > ask you to > > > create a Jira issue nevertheless, and attach all relevant > files. > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > Werner > > > > > > Ronald R. DiFrango wrote: > > > > All, > > > > > > > > I think I have hit the following bug and wanted > > confirmation that > > > that > > > > is in fact the case: > > > > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-2172 > > > > > > > > Here is snippet of my XSD: > > > > > > > > <xs:complexType name="ResponseType"> > > > > <xs:choice> > > > > <xs:sequence> > > > > <xs:element ref="ApplicationKey"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="ApplicationLabel"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="Status"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="Applicant" > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="CoApplicant" > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="ProductType" > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="CreditLimit" > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="APR" minOccurs="0"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="AccountNumber" > > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="ChaseTransactionID" > > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="CardExpirationDate" > > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="VendorStatus" > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > </xs:sequence> > > > > <xs:sequence> > > > > <xs:element ref="Status"> > > > > <xs:annotation> > > > > <xs:documentation>Carryover from > > Legacy > > > (always > > > > Error for IC Web)</xs:documentation> > > > > </xs:annotation> > > > > </xs:element> > > > > <xs:choice> > > > > <xs:sequence> > > > > <xs:element ref="Error"/> > > > > <xs:element ref="ApplicationLabel" > > > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > </xs:sequence> > > > > <xs:element ref="AppKey"> > > > > <xs:annotation> > > > > <xs:documentation>Carryover > > from Legacy. > > > > Only present in a successful asynchronous > > > response.</xs:documentation> > > > > </xs:annotation> > > > > </xs:element> > > > > </xs:choice> > > > > </xs:sequence> > > > > </xs:choice> > > > > </xs:complexType> > > > > > > > > <xs:element name="CreditApplicationResponse"> > > > > <xs:annotation> > > > > <xs:documentation>This document will be used > for > > > returning > > > > synchronous responses from the Credit Application > > > Gateway</xs:documentation> > > > > </xs:annotation> > > > > <xs:complexType> > > > > <xs:complexContent> > > > > <xs:extension base="ResponseType"/> > > > > </xs:complexContent> > > > > </xs:complexType> > > > > </xs:element> > > > > > > > > And when I create the following XML: > > > > > > > > <CreditApplicationResponse> > > > > <Status>Dummy</Status> > > > > <Error> > > > > <text>Dummy</text> > > > > </Error> > > > > <ApplicationLabel>dummy</ApplicationLabel> > > > > </CreditApplicationResponse> > > > > > > > > I get the following exception: > > > > > > > > org.exolab.castor.xml.MarshalException: Element with name > > Status > > > passed > > > > to type null in incorrect order; expected element with > name > > > > 'ApplicationKey' or any other optional element declared > > prior to > > > > it.{File: [not available]; line: 3; column: 10} > > > > > > > > Is this the same problem and if so, how do I work around > it? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Ron DiFrango > > > Blog (www.captech-soa.blogspot.com > > <http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com> > > <http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com>) > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ron DiFrango > > Blog (www.captech-soa.blogspot.com <http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com > >) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- Ron DiFrango Blog (www.captech-soa.blogspot.com)
