A run-time flag. In other words, should go into a castor.properties
that's on the classpath.
Werner
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Werner,
Thanks for the update. Is that a schema gen flag or a runtime flag?
Ron
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Werner Guttmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Ronald,
yes, this is a bug with 'sequence validation', indeed. As mentioned in
the Jira issue itself, there's a work around available that you could
use whilst we work on the resolution of this.
Regards
Werner
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> Werner,
>
> Bug 2313 [http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-2313] was
created and I
> have attached a test case. I put a note in the code, but I am
not using
> any mapping file, but I am just using the CodeGen taks to
generate the
> code from the XSD.
>
> Ron
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Werner Guttmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
wrote:
>
> Ronald,
>
> there's a XML HOW-TO that details what we'd like to see.
>
> Werner
>
> Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> > Werner,
> >
> > Will do! It is definitely an issue for us. Are the files
attached
> > below enough?
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Werner Guttmann
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Not sure, Ronald. Let me have a look in detail. Can I
please
> ask you to
> > create a Jira issue nevertheless, and attach all
relevant files.
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > Werner
> >
> > Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I think I have hit the following bug and wanted
> confirmation that
> > that
> > > is in fact the case:
> > >
> > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-2172
> > >
> > > Here is snippet of my XSD:
> > >
> > > <xs:complexType name="ResponseType">
> > > <xs:choice>
> > > <xs:sequence>
> > > <xs:element ref="ApplicationKey"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="ApplicationLabel"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="Status"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="Applicant"
minOccurs="0"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="CoApplicant"
minOccurs="0"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="ProductType"
minOccurs="0"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="CreditLimit"
minOccurs="0"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="APR" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="AccountNumber"
> minOccurs="0"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="ChaseTransactionID"
> minOccurs="0"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="CardExpirationDate"
> minOccurs="0"/>
> > > <xs:element ref="VendorStatus"
minOccurs="0"/>
> > > </xs:sequence>
> > > <xs:sequence>
> > > <xs:element ref="Status">
> > > <xs:annotation>
> > > <xs:documentation>Carryover
from
> Legacy
> > (always
> > > Error for IC Web)</xs:documentation>
> > > </xs:annotation>
> > > </xs:element>
> > > <xs:choice>
> > > <xs:sequence>
> > > <xs:element ref="Error"/>
> > > <xs:element
ref="ApplicationLabel"
> > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > </xs:sequence>
> > > <xs:element ref="AppKey">
> > > <xs:annotation>
> > > <xs:documentation>Carryover
> from Legacy.
> > > Only present in a successful asynchronous
> > response.</xs:documentation>
> > > </xs:annotation>
> > > </xs:element>
> > > </xs:choice>
> > > </xs:sequence>
> > > </xs:choice>
> > > </xs:complexType>
> > >
> > > <xs:element name="CreditApplicationResponse">
> > > <xs:annotation>
> > > <xs:documentation>This document will be
used for
> > returning
> > > synchronous responses from the Credit Application
> > Gateway</xs:documentation>
> > > </xs:annotation>
> > > <xs:complexType>
> > > <xs:complexContent>
> > > <xs:extension base="ResponseType"/>
> > > </xs:complexContent>
> > > </xs:complexType>
> > > </xs:element>
> > >
> > > And when I create the following XML:
> > >
> > > <CreditApplicationResponse>
> > > <Status>Dummy</Status>
> > > <Error>
> > > <text>Dummy</text>
> > > </Error>
> > > <ApplicationLabel>dummy</ApplicationLabel>
> > > </CreditApplicationResponse>
> > >
> > > I get the following exception:
> > >
> > > org.exolab.castor.xml.MarshalException: Element
with name
> Status
> > passed
> > > to type null in incorrect order; expected element
with name
> > > 'ApplicationKey' or any other optional element declared
> prior to
> > > it.{File: [not available]; line: 3; column: 10}
> > >
> > > Is this the same problem and if so, how do I work
around it?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ron
> >
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >
> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ron DiFrango
> > Blog (www.captech-soa.blogspot.com
<http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com>
> <http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com>
> <http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com>)
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ron DiFrango
> Blog (www.captech-soa.blogspot.com
<http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com>
<http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com>)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--
Ron DiFrango
Blog (www.captech-soa.blogspot.com <http://www.captech-soa.blogspot.com>)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
