Hello, Yes, the test.record class has the namespace specified. This is a wierd error, my xml looks great except for that one peculiar error. I wonder what is causing the marshaller to think that the list of records is in a different namespace.
Thanks for your help so far, i'll see what I can figure out, if something occurs to you please let me know. On 6/3/08, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi again > > Premal Shah wrote: > > Thanks Warner, > > Placing all the classes in the same namespace worked in removing the > > xmlns="" tags. > Great. > > > I do seem to have something peculiar happening when I'm > > trying to marshall an arraylist. I have the following mapping: > > > > <class name="test.Message" auto-complete="false"> > > <map-to xml="ICHData" ns-uri=http://test.namespace/> > > > > <field name="recordList" collection="arraylist" > > type="test.Record" container="false"> > > <bind-xml name="Recs" /> > > </field> > > </class> > > All the other fields map correctly, but this field still adds the > xmlns="" > > . Here is a snippet of the output.. > > ICHData xmlns="http://test.namespace";> > > <Recs xmlns=""> > > ...everything else is properly marshalled. > > Do I have to somehow put the arraylist in my namespace? > Hmm, ahrd to say. Is the text.Record class assigned to a namespace (as > you are setting container to 'flase' ? > > > > > Thanks again, > > P. shah > > > > > > On 6/3/08, Premal Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> That's a good point. I did that because I didn't want the namespace to > >> print there on the other lines. Essentially, my client handed me the > format > >> that they required and I tried to use castor to emulate it. > >> > >> > >> On 6/3/08, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> just looking at both the XML output and the mapping file (fragments), I > >>> have got a question: how come it's only the test.Message class that is > >>> being mapped to the 'http://test.com' namespace ? Is this on intention > ? > >>> Shouldn't the other classes (at least test.Type) to assigned to the > same > >>> namespace (or any other, if you wish) ? > >>> > >>> Mapping one class to a namespace (by the means of a mapping file) and > >>> another class not does not really make sense. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Werner > >>> > >>> Premal Shah wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> Thanks for your help. Here is the attached code fragments: > >>>> > >>>> <class name="test.Message" auto-complete="false"> > >>>> <map-to xml="XMLMessage" ns-uri="http://test.com"; /> > >>>> <field name="header" type="test.Header"> > >>>> <bind-xml name="Header" node="element" /> > >>>> </field> > >>>> <field name="metadata" type="test.Metadata"> > >>>> <bind-xml name="Metadata" node="element" /> > >>>> </field> > >>>> <field name="payload" type="test.Payload"> > >>>> <bind-xml name="Payload" node="element" /> > >>>> </field> > >>>> </class> > >>>> > >>>> <class name="test.Type" auto-complete="false"> > >>>> <map-to xml="Type" /> > >>>> <field name="key" type="java.lang.String"> > >>>> <bind-xml name="Key" node="element" /> > >>>> </field> > >>>> <field name="value" type="java.lang.String"> > >>>> <bind-xml name="Value" node="element" /> > >>>> </field> > >>>> </class> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ...other classes are defined here > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> snipped of code: > >>>> Marshaller MessageMarshaller = new Marshaller(handler); > > >>>> //MessageMarshaller.setSuppressNamespaces(true); > >>>> //MessageMarshaller.setNamespaceMapping("",http://test.com); > >>>> MessageMarshaller.setMapping(mapping); > >>>> MessageMarshaller.marshal(message); > >>>> Unmarshaller MessageUnmarshaller =new > >>>> Unmarshaller(mapping); > >>>> > >>>> System.out.println(writer.toString()); > >>>> StringReader reader=new > >>>> StringReader(writer.toString()); > >>>> Message x > >>>> =(Message)MessageUnmarshaller.unmarshal(reader); > >>>> > >>>> System.out.println("Header:\n"+x.getHeader().print()); > >>>> > >>>> System.out.println("Metadata:\n"+x.getMetadata().print()); > >>>> > >>>> System.out.println("Payload:\n"+x.getPayload().print()); > >>>> > >>>> snippet of xml produced: > >>>> > >>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > >>>> <XMLMessage xmlns="http://test.com";> > >>>> <Header xmlns=""> > >>>> <MessageID>test</MessageID> > >>>> <MessageType>test</MessageType> > >>>> <MessageCategory>test</MessageCategory> > >>>> <AckStatus></AckStatus> > >>>> <Checksum>fff</Checksum> > >>>> <EncodeType>hhhh</EncodeType> > >>>> <Sender>mm</Sender> > >>>> <Recipient>kk</Recipient> > >>>> <EncryptionType></EncryptionType> > >>>> </Header> > >>>> <Metadata xmlns=""> > >>>> <Type> > >>>> <Key>DCC</Key> > >>>> <Value>MSD</Value> > >>>> </Type> > >>>> My client cannot handle the xmlns="", however when I uncomment the > >>> following > >>>> lines: > >>>> > >>>> //MessageMarshaller.setSuppressNamespaces(true); > >>>> //MessageMarshaller.setNamespaceMapping("",http://test.com); > >>>> > >>>> My xml looks like how my client requires it as follows but then my > >>>> unmarshalled message is full of null objects. I appreciate your > insight > >>>> into this. > >>>> > >>>> <XMLMessage xmlns="http://test.com";> > >>>> <Header> > >>>> ....... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 6/1/08, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> can you please give us some more code fragments to show what you are > >>>>> doing ? I.e. a mapping file (fragment), XML being produced, etc. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> Werner > >>>>> > >>>>> Premal Shah wrote: > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> I have generated a mapping file in which one class has a ns-uri > >>> element > >>>>> in > >>>>>> the <map-to xml> tag. The problem that I have is that after I > >>> marshall > >>>>>> this, the tags that are generated all have <xmlns=""> except for the > >>> one > >>>>>> that i have specified the ns-uri for. However, I am able to > correctly > >>>>>> unmarshal the the xml back to the objects. My clients parser cannot > >>>>> handle > >>>>>> the <xmlns=""> so I tried to use the > >>> setsuppressedNamespaces(true). This > >>>>>> creates an xml format that is satisfactory, but the objects are null > >>> when > >>>>> I > >>>>>> unmarshal them. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any insites into this problem? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>>>> P. Shah > >>>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > >>>>> > >>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > >>> > >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
