For the sake of completeness, can you please set the container attribute
to true, and check whether anything changes. If that's the case, I will
have to ask you to create a new Jira issue at

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR

and attach all relevant files.

Werner

Premal Shah wrote:
> Hello,
> Yes, the test.record class has the namespace specified.  This is a wierd
> error, my xml looks great except for that one peculiar error.  I wonder what
> is causing the marshaller to think that the list of records is in a
> different namespace.
> 
> Thanks for your help so far, i'll see what I can figure out, if something
> occurs to you please let me know.
> 
> 
> On 6/3/08, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi again
>>
>> Premal Shah wrote:
>>> Thanks Warner,
>>>  Placing all the classes in the same namespace worked in removing the
>>> xmlns="" tags.
>> Great.
>>
>>> I do seem to have something peculiar happening when I'm
>>> trying to marshall an arraylist.  I have the following mapping:
>>>
>>> <class name="test.Message" auto-complete="false">
>>>                 <map-to xml="ICHData" ns-uri=http://test.namespace/>
>>>
>>>                 <field name="recordList" collection="arraylist"
>>>                         type="test.Record" container="false">
>>>                         <bind-xml name="Recs" />
>>>                 </field>
>>>         </class>
>>> All the other fields map correctly, but this field still adds the
>> xmlns=""
>>> .  Here is a snippet of the output..
>>> ICHData xmlns="http://test.namespace";>
>>> <Recs xmlns="">
>>> ...everything else is properly marshalled.
>>> Do I have to somehow put the arraylist in my namespace?
>> Hmm, ahrd to say. Is the text.Record class assigned to a namespace (as
>> you are setting container to 'flase' ?
>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>> P. shah
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/3/08, Premal Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> That's a good point.  I did that because I didn't want the namespace to
>>>> print there on the other lines.  Essentially, my client handed me the
>> format
>>>> that they required and I tried to use castor to emulate it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On 6/3/08, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> just looking at both the XML output and the mapping file (fragments), I
>>>>> have got a question: how come it's only the test.Message class that is
>>>>> being mapped to the 'http://test.com' namespace ? Is this on intention
>> ?
>>>>> Shouldn't the other classes (at least test.Type) to assigned to the
>> same
>>>>> namespace (or any other, if you wish) ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Mapping one class to a namespace (by the means of a mapping file) and
>>>>> another class not does not really make sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Werner
>>>>>
>>>>> Premal Shah wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> Thanks for your help.  Here is the attached code fragments:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <class name="test.Message" auto-complete="false">
>>>>>>           <map-to xml="XMLMessage" ns-uri="http://test.com"; />
>>>>>>                 <field name="header" type="test.Header">
>>>>>>                         <bind-xml name="Header" node="element" />
>>>>>>                 </field>
>>>>>>                 <field name="metadata" type="test.Metadata">
>>>>>>                         <bind-xml name="Metadata" node="element" />
>>>>>>                 </field>
>>>>>>                 <field name="payload" type="test.Payload">
>>>>>>                         <bind-xml name="Payload" node="element" />
>>>>>>                 </field>
>>>>>>         </class>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <class name="test.Type" auto-complete="false">
>>>>>>                 <map-to xml="Type" />
>>>>>>                 <field name="key" type="java.lang.String">
>>>>>>                 <bind-xml name="Key" node="element" />
>>>>>>                 </field>
>>>>>>                 <field name="value" type="java.lang.String">
>>>>>>                 <bind-xml name="Value" node="element" />
>>>>>>                 </field>
>>>>>>         </class>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...other classes are defined here
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> snipped of code:
>>>>>>         Marshaller MessageMarshaller = new Marshaller(handler);
>>>>>>                          //MessageMarshaller.setSuppressNamespaces(true);
>>>>>> //MessageMarshaller.setNamespaceMapping("",http://test.com);
>>>>>>                         MessageMarshaller.setMapping(mapping);
>>>>>>                         MessageMarshaller.marshal(message);
>>>>>>                         Unmarshaller MessageUnmarshaller =new
>>>>>> Unmarshaller(mapping);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         System.out.println(writer.toString());
>>>>>>                         StringReader reader=new
>>>>>> StringReader(writer.toString());
>>>>>>                         Message x
>>>>>> =(Message)MessageUnmarshaller.unmarshal(reader);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> System.out.println("Header:\n"+x.getHeader().print());
>>>>>>
>>>>>> System.out.println("Metadata:\n"+x.getMetadata().print());
>>>>>>
>>>>>> System.out.println("Payload:\n"+x.getPayload().print());
>>>>>>
>>>>>> snippet of xml produced:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>>>>> <XMLMessage xmlns="http://test.com";>
>>>>>>     <Header xmlns="">
>>>>>>         <MessageID>test</MessageID>
>>>>>>         <MessageType>test</MessageType>
>>>>>>         <MessageCategory>test</MessageCategory>
>>>>>>         <AckStatus></AckStatus>
>>>>>>         <Checksum>fff</Checksum>
>>>>>>         <EncodeType>hhhh</EncodeType>
>>>>>>         <Sender>mm</Sender>
>>>>>>         <Recipient>kk</Recipient>
>>>>>>         <EncryptionType></EncryptionType>
>>>>>>     </Header>
>>>>>>     <Metadata xmlns="">
>>>>>>         <Type>
>>>>>>             <Key>DCC</Key>
>>>>>>             <Value>MSD</Value>
>>>>>>         </Type>
>>>>>> My client cannot handle the xmlns="", however when I uncomment the
>>>>> following
>>>>>> lines:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      //MessageMarshaller.setSuppressNamespaces(true);
>>>>>> //MessageMarshaller.setNamespaceMapping("",http://test.com);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My xml looks like how my client requires it as follows but then my
>>>>>> unmarshalled message is full of null objects.  I appreciate your
>> insight
>>>>>> into this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <XMLMessage xmlns="http://test.com";>
>>>>>>    <Header>
>>>>>> .......
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/1/08, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> can you please give us some more code fragments to show what you are
>>>>>>> doing ? I.e. a mapping file (fragment), XML being produced, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Werner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Premal Shah wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> I have generated a mapping file in which one class has a ns-uri
>>>>> element
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> the <map-to xml> tag.  The problem that I have is that after I
>>>>> marshall
>>>>>>>> this, the tags that are generated all have <xmlns=""> except for the
>>>>> one
>>>>>>>> that i have specified the ns-uri for.  However, I am able to
>> correctly
>>>>>>>> unmarshal the the xml back to the objects.  My clients parser cannot
>>>>>>> handle
>>>>>>>> the <xmlns=""> so I tried to use the
>>>>> setsuppressedNamespaces(true).  This
>>>>>>>> creates an xml format that is satisfactory, but the objects are null
>>>>> when
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> unmarshal them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any insites into this problem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>>>> P. Shah
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>
>>>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to