Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?

[Andrus Adamchik]

On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:27 AM, jerome moliere wrote:
(I 'm using the JTDS driver now)
one big difference is that now : cayenne uses the generic db  
adapter because
the JDBC driver doesn't understand the meta data returned from db...

FYI - this is fixed in 1.2, 2.0 and 3.0 branches per CAY-775 issue in  
Jira.

Andrus